NirvanaFallacy and joneses, since you both and others have decided to completely be against President Obama as being in the position of President and are only looking at everything he has done as being a negative FOR this Republic. Then SO be it, if that is the judgment your want everyone else to know you are using, it is not my problem, but you'als. The World keeps on turning.
President Obama has been elected twice for two terms legally by the Presidential election process, thanks to the better judgment of the majority of the voters.

If the people want to really to be honest in making their life's decisions, based on their best realistic judgment, it will be the 2014 and the 2016 Elections. The time has come for ALL of the voters to consider their need, for the good of the 47% and the 98%, to vote for the Democratic Candidates after getting informed of the facts instead being over loaded and over exposed with the misleading lies and misinformation being put out by the opponents of this administration.

joneses, if you were not so biased AGAINST PRESIDENT Obama you would be able to see how backward this Republic was being taKEN BEFORe pRESIDENT Obama was elected/

joneses said... Hussein Obama is the most dishonest person to ever occupy the White House and foolish liberals show their stupidity by believing every word this liar says. Hussein Obama is out to destroy America as we know it.

joneses, You left yourself too much wiggle room on who has been lying the most.
It was my thinking that George W. Bush and his adminisrtration were at the top of the list when it comes to the liars club. Too bad you are not living in the White House. With this post and thwe others above you might top Bush W.

What will happen when the 98% of the masses do not have money to spend on imported goods? The loss of US workers' jobs have been caused from the effects of the global economy, with a trade deficit of more than $48 Billion dollars PER MONTH. Now they are against helping the private sectors in re-creating the needed manufacturing/production jobs here? The Republicans' objectives/policies would continue to force more people into poverty and then their principles are against using our Government for helping with these people's existence. Forget about the workers having any representation on the job or there being any help for the people who cannot find a job when there is only one job available for every four people looking for work? The Republicans have made it clear that they would not help and would leave these people in poverty to "fend" for themselves.

zableedofisterix, people who use their judgment as you do not have to know a person to have an excuse take a PERSONAL attitude against them. I am convinced that under the circumstances you would not want to recognize who is deliberately lying to the people.

zableedofisterix, you appear or seem to be highly biased and are taking the the fact that Obama is the President of these United States on a too personal level and cannot accept that he was legally elected twice.
This Republic cannot be sustained with the Gridlock AND with the unsustainable $42 to $46 Billion dollar TRADE DEFICIT PER MONTH, created by the US consumers with the global corporations. Therefore, the enemies of President Obama that are causing the obstructionism, have prevented a full recovery of the 2007 deep recession. Time is of the essence. Going backwards into another great depression, similar to the one in 1929 is not an option to consider. zableedofisterix, whom do you think can "fix" all of the problems that need to be gotten rid of? zableedofisterix, If you are new, "Oh, shucks, I'm so intimidated by your bold type" the bold print comes out on it's own. I do not like when it does the bold thing. I did not do the bold print to hollow at you.

How can you tell a terrorist from an elected Republican who wants this Republic to fail? In January 2009 "their number one objective was to cause President Obama's failure during his first term." All I am saying is that if the Republicans had been able to have caused the President's failure, the economic conditions would have been more like another great depression and we would not be concerned with the temporary inconvenience of this "sequester."

zableedofisterix,Terrorism to our Republic and to the people can be classified under the physical damage done or by other means, such as financial or mental damage. We have had our share of all the above over the past years and recently by "non elected" individuals acting to cause mential and physical harm to the people and to this country. When the Republicans had their planning session, on the same day President Obama was sworn in, January 2009, they decided to make it "their number one objective to cause his failure during his first term. I personally have taken their actions as being very negative against President Obama and to our entire country since he has been elected President. The Republicans have stepped over the "political line" in trying to get the people to not respect this President. Therefore their tactics and their strategies should be questioned. What if their objectives of causing the failure they wanted and were trying to cause had resulted in causing another GREAT DEPRESSION? Would their actions against the Commander in Chief's policies be considered worse than a terrorist attack?

zableedofisterix said... Easy, Easy. It sounds like a woman, but she looks and acts like a man. Don't you recognize sarcasm when you see it. Humorless leftist toad.

Reply: zableedofisterix, There is not any "humor" in your kind of "sarcasm." All I get out of reading your BS is that you have not learned to have any respect for any one who does not think and act as you.

zableedofisterix said... Carl, you sound just like that man on MSNBC, Rachel Madcow. Are you her/him/it?

Reply: zableedofisterix, How do you know what I sound like? Are you looking for an easy way to insult someone and to get off of the subject? Do the words and the message of truth disturb you?